Workflow architecture
Mapping how casework actually moves, not how the org chart says it should.
01
Nyxstems Advisory
Independent advisory for firms that need their workflow examined honestly before it's rebuilt.
Regulatory compliance
Controls that hold up under audit, built from the obligation outward.
Data governance
Ownership, retention and access rules that survive a change of system.
Systems integration
Connecting the tools you already run without adding a second source of truth.
02
Trust is an architectural outcome.
Evidence before assertion
A claim about a system stands only once it can be shown, not just stated.
Control by design
Compliance is a property of the architecture, not a checklist run afterwards.
Interoperate, then improve
New systems earn their place by working with what exists, before replacing it.
Start with focused discovery. Leave with a decision-ready roadmap.
- 01Map the current workflow and its failure points.
- 02Identify the controls that are missing or unverifiable.
- 03Weigh build, buy and integrate against each other.
- 04Leave you with a roadmap you can act on without us.
A fixed-fee, paid engagement.
03
Products in development
Two separate products, built independently. Neither depends on the other.
Regulis ::
In development
Designed quietly. Tested against real work. Revealed when it is ready.
Solidus /.
In development
Built where it will be used. Tested against live data. Shared once it holds.
04
Where the judgement comes from
Advisory only, so no logos or testimonials to point to. This is the record instead.
- Years spent inside live insolvency and restructuring casework, not observing it from outside.
- Built and maintained the systems practitioners actually work from day to day.
- Worked directly against the regulatory obligations these systems are built to satisfy.
- Every recommendation here has been tested against a real engagement first.